esxi6.7 与 pve6 unixbench跑分对比

浅忆发布于 2020-08-09 收录于日常

新建的虚拟机下同配置跑的分，均开启了host。配置为 8C8G50G。

ESXI6.7

        
        
        
    

           #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #  
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #  
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######  
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #  
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #  
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #  
   Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark  
   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,  
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA  
   January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com  
Wide character in print at ./Run line 1511.  
Wide character in printf at ./Run line 1542.  
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3  
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3  
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Process Creation  1 2 3  
1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3  
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3  
Wide character in printf at ./Run line 1484.  
8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3  
8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3  
8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
8 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Process Creation  1 2 3  
8 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3  
8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3  
Wide character in printf at ./Run line 1484.  
========================================================================  
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)  
   System: debian: GNU/Linux  
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.19.0-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.19.37-5 (2019-06-19)  
   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)  
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")  
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization  
   01:35:22 up  1:33,  2 users,  load average: 3.18, 3.77, 2.12; runlevel  
------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Benchmark Run: 一 8月 10 2020 01:35:22 - 02:02:31  
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       37275700.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5654.1 MWIPS (6.2 s, 7 samples)  
Execl Throughput                               4156.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        697111.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          187842.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2194571.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Pipe Throughput                              985672.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Pipe-based Context Switching                  46277.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Process Creation                               2855.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4167.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1955.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
System Call Overhead                         688554.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   37275700.7   3194.1  
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5654.1   1028.0  
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4156.3    966.6  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     697111.7   1760.4  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     187842.5   1135.0  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2194571.2   3783.7  
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     985672.0    792.3  
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      46277.6    115.7  
Process Creation                                126.0       2855.4    226.6  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4167.8    983.0  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1955.7   3259.4  
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     688554.4    459.0  
                                                                   ========  
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         974.5  
------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Benchmark Run: 一 8月 10 2020 02:02:31 - 02:29:45  
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables      272463301.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Double-Precision Whetstone                    41703.8 MWIPS (6.5 s, 7 samples)  
Execl Throughput                              23978.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        979782.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          263271.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3177481.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Pipe Throughput                             7084002.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Pipe-based Context Switching                1632492.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Process Creation                              43134.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  44920.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6769.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
System Call Overhead                        4393974.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  272463301.5  23347.3  
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      41703.8   7582.5  
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      23978.3   5576.3  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     979782.2   2474.2  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     263271.7   1590.8  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3177481.5   5478.4  
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    7084002.7   5694.5  
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    1632492.5   4081.2  
Process Creation                                126.0      43134.3   3423.4  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      44920.5  10594.5  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       6769.3  11282.1  
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4393974.7   2929.3  
                                                                   ========  
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        5383.8  
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
    

PVE6.2

        
        
        
    

        make[1]: Leaving directory '/opt/unixbench/UnixBench'  
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory  
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory  
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory  
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory  
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory  
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory  
sh: 1: 3dinfo: not found  
sh: 1: runlevel: not found  
   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #  
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #  
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######  
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #  
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #  
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #  
   Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark  
   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,  
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA  
   January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com  
Wide character in print at ./Run line 1511.  
Wide character in printf at ./Run line 1542.  
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3  
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3  
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Process Creation  1 2 3  
1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3  
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3  
Wide character in printf at ./Run line 1484.  
8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3  
8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3  
8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3  
8 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Process Creation  1 2 3  
8 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3  
8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3  
Wide character in printf at ./Run line 1484.  
========================================================================  
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)  
   System: debian: GNU/Linux  
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.19.0-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.19.37-5 (2019-06-19)  
   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)  
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")  
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)  
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET  
   11:14:36 up 3 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.57, 0.19, 0.06; runlevel  
------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Benchmark Run: 二 8月 11 2020 11:14:36 - 11:42:00  
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       38457773.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5894.1 MWIPS (7.7 s, 7 samples)  
Execl Throughput                               3653.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        594688.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          155116.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2093652.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Pipe Throughput                              840578.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Pipe-based Context Switching                  69113.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Process Creation                               2092.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3592.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1596.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
System Call Overhead                         661908.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   38457773.2   3295.4  
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5894.1   1071.7  
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3653.5    849.6  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     594688.8   1501.7  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     155116.1    937.3  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2093652.8   3609.7  
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     840578.6    675.7  
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      69113.8    172.8  
Process Creation                                126.0       2092.7    166.1  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3592.3    847.2  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1596.2   2660.3  
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     661908.8    441.3  
                                                                   ========  
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         903.0  
------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Benchmark Run: 二 8月 11 2020 11:42:00 - 12:09:16  
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables      279669766.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Double-Precision Whetstone                    41943.0 MWIPS (6.3 s, 7 samples)  
Execl Throughput                              18412.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        488871.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          126347.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1596495.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Pipe Throughput                             6013413.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Pipe-based Context Switching                 967469.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
Process Creation                              25260.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  37695.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   5645.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)  
System Call Overhead                        3703628.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)  
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX  
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  279669766.0  23964.8  
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      41943.0   7626.0  
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      18412.5   4282.0  
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     488871.1   1234.5  
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     126347.3    763.4  
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1596495.9   2752.6  
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    6013413.0   4833.9  
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     967469.4   2418.7  
Process Creation                                126.0      25260.2   2004.8  
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      37695.0   8890.3  
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       5645.7   9409.4  
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3703628.1   2469.1  
                                                                   ========  
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3825.7  
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
    

记录IDRAC断电恢复上一次配置(密码)的问题

浅忆发布于 2020-08-08 收录于日常

https://blog.curlc.com/archives/595.html
这台机器买来后idrac有一个问题，只要断电，idrac的密码就会被恢复为上一次设置的密码.如果在bios重置密码也会被“永久”的设置成calvin这个默认密码。
所以特别蛋疼，每次断电开机完就得修改密码，在dell社区问过一次，答复居然是“一般服务器是不会断电”，真的是无语了……

office e5 常见问题

浅忆发布于 2020-07-20 收录于日常

查看剩余天数(使用申请的e5账户登录)
https://developer.microsoft.com/zh-cn/microsoft-365/dev-program
https://developer.microsoft.com/zh-cn/microsoft-365/profile
Office管理界面组织管理号登录
www.office.com/?auth=2
admin管理中心
https://admin.microsoft.com Microsoft 365
Onedrive容量 1T 修改为5T，老帐号不删除重建
https://blog.curlc.com/archives/66.html

Docker快速搭建Firefox Send

浅忆发布于 2020-06-09 收录于日常

1、安装Docker

此命令我在debian中运行没问题，其他系统自测~

wget -qO- https://get.docker.com/ | sh

2、创建docker网络

请参考此文章
https://blog.curlc.com/archives/618.html

3、Docker安装Redis

其中的 –net 参数，就是刚刚建立的docker网络(内网)

Fiddler无法解密https请求解决方法

浅忆发布于 2020-05-18 收录于日常

背景

The selected session is a HTTP CONNECT Tunnel.
所选的会话是 HTTP CONNECT 隧道。该隧道使客户端能够通过 HTTP…….

https抓包出现这个标识无法解密https会话，证书存储区中可能有一些旧的Fiddler证书，由于某些原因(比如升级版本，更换版本后重新生成证书)，这些证书在重置期间未清除，所以需要手动进行清除旧证书。

红米K20 Pro 刷Pixel Experience

浅忆发布于 2020-05-16 收录于日常

看见k20 pro 有pixel的包了，刷了后感觉还不错，比小米要各种权限好多了，还会后台自动刷新权限。
网上的教程很多，参考了下，有个地方要注意的是，用国内的miui做底包不行，会导致卡在 mi logo界面。

rabbitMQ rabbitmq_delayed_message_exchange 清空延时消息

浅忆发布于 2020-04-22 收录于日常

问题描述：

在安装了这个延时插件后不能清空已加入的消息，删除和重新创建交换是不够的，延迟的消息仍将传递。

解决办法：

禁用并重新启用插件：

        
        rabbitmq-plugins disable rabbitmq_delayed_message_exchange  
rabbitmq-plugins enable rabbitmq_delayed_message_exchange

github问题说明： https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-delayed-message-exchange/issues/16

ubuntu 循环登陆（闪退，登陆成功后又跳回登陆界面）

浅忆发布于 2020-04-11 收录于日常

表现为在图形登陆界面能够正常验证密码正误，在正确输入密码后，出现命令行下的自检界面，然后立即闪回到登陆界面。而且这个问题一般是出现在某些账户下，其他账户尤其是guest账户不受影响。而且命令行登陆也不受影响。
这个问题存在于ubuntu的多个版本中：ubuntu 12.04 ，ubuntu 12.10，ubuntu 13.04，ubuntu 13.10 （勾引搜索引擎用^-^）
一个最常见的原因是该账户下的的.Xauthority文件的对当前用户没有读写权限。这个文件是用来记录Xserver登陆情况的，而且默认权限限制地很严（只有owner有rw权限），由于某些意外，所有者变成了root，导致我们用当前账号登陆的时候无法完成完整的登陆程序，而被退出。
修改的方法很简单，通过命令行登陆(Ctrl+Alt+F1)，将拥有者（和组）改为当前用户。
例如我的用户名为 abc
使用命令：
cd ~
ls -a
(会看到.Xauthority的所有者和组是root)
sudo chown abc:abc .Xauthority
*返回图形界面：Ctrl+Alt+F7

本文转载至：http://blog.csdn.net/yanxiangtianji

常用内网穿透工具

浅忆发布于 2020-03-30 收录于日常

frp
FRP 功能完整，主要采用 GO 语言实现，重量级的工具，服务端界面样式风格一般。
配置繁琐，不同的协议需要配置不同的参数，采用文件存放数据，不支持数据库管理数据。
https://github.com/fatedier/frp
holer
轻量级的内网穿透工具，holer 服务端采用 Java 语言实现，服务端界面漂亮简洁。
Holer 客户端采用了 Java 语言和 GO 语言实现了两种版本，支持几乎所有的 OS 平台。
用到流行的微服务框架 springboot 和 Java 网络框架 netty。
配置很简单，针对所有 TCP 协议只需在客户端设置一个 holer access key 即可。
采用 MySQL 数据库统一管理数据。
https://github.com/wisdom-projects/holer
nps
轻量级的内网穿透工具，完全采用 GO 语言实现，服务端界面漂亮简洁。
支持的协议最广泛，配置稍简单，采用文件存放数据，不支持数据库管理数据。
https://github.com/ehang-io/nps
lanproxy
轻量级的内网穿透工具，客户端采用 GO 语言和 Java 语言实现两种版本，采用了 Java 网络框架 netty，服务端界面体验较差。
配置稍繁琐，采用文件存放数据，不支持数据库管理数据。
https://github.com/ffay/lanproxy

679.AdGuard Home 搭建一个无广告DNS

浅忆发布于 2020-02-12 收录于日常

上次说到简书移动端Web劫持、跳转app问题

我个人原本是是在dnsmasq里面屏蔽ad.lflucky.com这个域名，刚好今天评论里有位读者说AdGuard Home也不错，所以就尝试了下，可视化界面配合起来用着也是很爽~