新版可续签的Office 365开发者试用订阅!E5(附自动续订的方法)

以前的Office 365开发者试用订阅(简称E3)有效期只有一年,一年过后数据都没了。 现在微软推出的新版订阅有效时间位90天,可自动进行订阅 官方教程(手动复制打开):https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office/developer-program/office-365-developer-program 自动续订教程: https://blog.curlc.com/archives/687.html 1、加入Office 365开发人员计划 https://developer.microsoft.com/zh-cn/office/dev-program 2、右上角Microsoft帐户或启用Azure Active Directory的电子邮件登录 3、登录后填写国家和地区 填写基本信息 4、创建订阅 需要注意的是,这里选择的国家很重要 ,关系到你的onedrive数据等存储位置。比如我选择US,那么我的数据就是放在美国的微软数据中心。 下面张图中的“域名”弄错了,因该是 “域”,可随意填写 填写手机号进行验证 这样就注册好了,接下来需要对自己的账号添加许可证 ,不然用不了的。 5、添加许可证 点击上图的 Go to subscription ,进入后台 管理 - > 用户 -> 活跃用户 -> 点击用户名 -> 许可证和用户 ,添加好后点击应用就可以了 6、自动订阅 (保活) 待完善…… 目前仅仅使用onedrive api就能保活(前提是必须要自己创建的api key),所以使用oneindex程序就可以了。但实际上还是需要outlook api,等失效了再补上。 2020-01-21: 经测试,当调用outlook的api后的第二天就会进行续期,如果在到期前20-30天调用,那么会提前续期。 2020-02-22: 正常情况一般是在到期前20-30天微软才会续期(前提是调用api)。 如果没有调用,那么在 1 - 20 天以内调用api也会进行续期,大概在1-3天以内吧,只是现在只调一次好像也不行了,貌似有频率,达到标准后才会进行续期。 2020-02-24: 对于已过期但未删除的订阅,我测试连续调用3天后会进行续期。 自动订阅程序会在本周日(2020-03-01)之前上线。 2020-03-01: 大家稍等,马上完成了~ 23:49 刚好卡在最后10分钟完成了,因为在部署的时候遇到个奇怪的bug,所以…… 自动续订教程: https://blog.curlc.com/archives/687.html

2019年11月20日 · 1 分钟 · 浅忆

Docker 容器之间通信方法

DOcker:新的联网功能允许您按容器的名称连接到容器,因此,如果创建一个新网络,则连接到该网络的任何容器都可以通过其名称访问其他容器。: 1)创建新网络 1 docker network create <network-name> 2)将容器连接到网络 1 docker run --net=<network-name> ... 或者将已存在容器加入新的网络 1 docker network connect <network-name> <container-name> 3)按名称ping容器 1 docker exec -ti <container-name-A> ping <container-name-B> Ps:需要注意的是,如果容器没有指定名称(–name),那么就只能用id。 1 2 3 4 64 bytes from c1 (172.18.0.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.137 ms 64 bytes from c1 (172.18.0.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms 64 bytes from c1 (172.18.0.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.074 ms 64 bytes from c1 (172.18.0.4): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.074 ms 请参阅文档的此部分; 注意:与旧版本不同links,新网络将不会创建环境变量,也不会与其他容器共享环境变量。 此功能当前不支持别名 ...

2019年11月1日 · 1 分钟 · 浅忆

verynginx安装教程

VeryNginx VeryNginx 是一个功能强大而对人类友好的 Nginx 扩展程序.可作为cc、waf防火墙使用。 介绍 VeryNginx 基于 lua_nginx_module(openrestry) 开发,实现了高级的防火墙、访问统计和其他的一些功能。 集成在 Nginx 中运行,扩展了 Nginx 本身的功能,并提供了友好的 Web 交互界面。 VeryNginx在线实例 用户名 / 密码: verynginx / verynginx 详细配置说明见:VeryNginx Github WiKi Nginx 运行状态分析 每秒请求数 响应时间 网络流量 网络连接数 自定义行为 VeryNginx 包含强大的自定义功能,可以做很多事情 自定义行为包含两部分, Matcher 和 Action 。 Matcher 用来对请求进行匹配, Action 为要执行的动作 这样的优势在于把所有的前置判断整合在Matcher里一起来实现了,使复杂(组合)规则的实现变成了可能 Matcher 一个 Matcher 用来判断一个 Http 请求是否符合指定的条件, 一个 Matcher 可以包含一个或者多个约束条件,目前支持以下几种约束: Client IP Host UserAgent URI Referer Request Args 当一个请求没有违反 Matcher 中包含的全部条件时,即命中了这个 Matcher Action 每个 Action 会引用一个 Matcher ,当 Matcher 命中时, Action 会被执行 目前已经实现了以下 Action ...

2019年10月16日 · 2 分钟 · 浅忆

chevereto nginx rewrite 规则

网上看了几篇规则倒是可以,但是我的用户名是admin,和后台管理界面冲突了,显示404。以下是官方的rewrite。 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 #Chevereto: Disable access to sensitive files location ~* /(app|content|lib)/.*\.(po|php|lock|sql)$ { deny all; } #Chevereto: CORS headers location ~* /.*\.(ttf|ttc|otf|eot|woff|woff2|font.css|css|js) { add_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"; } #Chevereto: Upload path for image content only and set 404 replacement location ^~ /images/ { location ~* (jpe?g|png|gif) { log_not_found off; error_page 404 /content/images/system/default/404.gif; } return 403; } #Chevereto: Pretty URLs location / { index index.php; try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php?$query_string; } In case you installed Chevereto in a sub folder, the rules should look like this(如果您将Chevereto安装在子文件夹中,则规则应如下所示:): ...

2019年10月16日 · 1 分钟 · 浅忆

KS10 基础测试

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.6 Usage : wget -qO- git.io/superbench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz CPU Cores : 4 Cores 1599.951 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 6144 KB OS : Debian GNU/Linux 9 (64 Bit) Dedicated Kernel : 4.9.0-11-amd64 Total Space : 1.7 GB / 1843.7 GB Total RAM : 297 MB / 15950 MB (1219 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 0 MB / 1022 MB Uptime : 1 days 1 hour 25 min Load Average : 0.21, 0.05, 0.02 TCP CC : bbr ASN & ISP : AS16276, OVH ISP Organization : OVH SAS Location : Roubaix, France / FR Region : Hauts-de-France ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 146 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 149 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 145 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 146.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 97.05 Mbit/s 92.86 Mbit/s 15.055 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 53.2 Mbit/s - Beijing 5G CT 12.62 Mbit/s 8.84 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CT 9.84 Mbit/s 6.91 Mbit/s - Hefei 5G CT 8.43 Mbit/s 9.82 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CT 3.13 Mbit/s 1.16 Mbit/s - TianJin 5G CU 19.46 Mbit/s 5.04 Mbit/s - Shanghai 5G CU 3.47 Mbit/s 4.01 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CU 3.33 Mbit/s 3.10 Mbit/s - Tianjin 5G CM 13.29 Mbit/s 28.92 Mbit/s - Wuxi 5G CM 2.79 Mbit/s 4.29 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CM 5.69 Mbit/s 4.19 Mbit/s - Changsha 5G CM 8.95 Mbit/s 9.28 Mbit/s - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 10 sec Timestamp : 2019-12-28 17:24:31 GMT+8 Results : /root/superbench.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Share result: · http://www.speedtest.net/result/8894357995.png · https://paste.ubuntu.com./p/wdfMqWt8KJ/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------

2019年9月28日 · 2 分钟 · 浅忆

KS7 基础测试

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.6 Usage : wget -qO- git.io/superbench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2130 CPU @ 3.40GHz CPU Cores : 4 Cores 1672.115 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 3072 KB OS : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit) Dedicated Kernel : 4.14.129-bbrplus Total Space : 8.4 GB / 1843.2 GB Total RAM : 1421 MB / 7875 MB (4847 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 303 MB / 2046 MB Uptime : 105 days 15 hour 1 min Load Average : 0.20, 0.17, 0.11 TCP CC : bbrplus ASN & ISP : AS16276, OVH SAS Organization : OVH Hosting, Inc. Location : Montreal, Canada / CA Region : Quebec ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 153 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 154 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 159 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 155.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 97.26 Mbit/s 93.23 Mbit/s 6.052 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 93.6 Mbit/s - Beijing 5G CT 9.32 Mbit/s 29.70 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CT 20.71 Mbit/s 29.61 Mbit/s - Hefei 5G CT 7.68 Mbit/s 21.46 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CT 0.85 Mbit/s 8.17 Mbit/s - TianJin 5G CU 13.29 Mbit/s 20.45 Mbit/s - Shanghai 5G CU 8.82 Mbit/s 23.73 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CU 10.23 Mbit/s 25.83 Mbit/s - Tianjin 5G CM 6.77 Mbit/s 13.90 Mbit/s - Wuxi 5G CM 3.50 Mbit/s 10.39 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CM 5.56 Mbit/s 17.93 Mbit/s - Changsha 5G CM 1.96 Mbit/s 47.78 Mbit/s - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 7 min 4 sec Timestamp : 2019-12-28 17:22:38 GMT+8 Results : /root/superbench.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Share result: · http://www.speedtest.net/result/8894353677.png · https://paste.ubuntu.com./p/W5s7w5j9SB/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------

2019年9月28日 · 2 分钟 · 浅忆

ikoula 9.9欧特价机测试

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.6 Usage : wget -qO- git.io/superbench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G3930 @ 2.90GHz CPU Cores : 2 Cores 2900.132 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 2048 KB OS : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit) Dedicated Kernel : 4.14.129-bbrplus Total Space : 496.1 GB / 1844.2 GB Total RAM : 857 MB / 7935 MB (5935 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 196 MB / 1023 MB Uptime : 120 days 20 hour 9 min Load Average : 0.04, 0.06, 0.01 TCP CC : bbrplus ASN & ISP : AS21409, Ikoula Ripe Organization : Location : Boulogne-Billancourt, France / FR Region : Île-de-France ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 177 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 180 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 186 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 181.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 776.17 Mbit/s 865.04 Mbit/s 9.314 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 154.9 Mbit/s - Beijing 5G CT 3.88 Mbit/s 58.06 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CT 7.71 Mbit/s 85.37 Mbit/s - Hefei 5G CT 4.14 Mbit/s 32.01 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CT 2.73 Mbit/s 19.70 Mbit/s - TianJin 5G CU 60.37 Mbit/s 89.34 Mbit/s - Shanghai 5G CU 3.52 Mbit/s 12.35 Mbit/s - Guangzhou 5G CU 3.17 Mbit/s 20.52 Mbit/s - Tianjin 5G CM 12.40 Mbit/s 50.79 Mbit/s - Wuxi 5G CM 0.23 Mbit/s 0.19 Mbit/s - Nanjing 5G CM 5.03 Mbit/s 24.05 Mbit/s - Changsha 5G CM 9.78 Mbit/s 336.54 Mbit/s - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 20 sec Timestamp : 2019-12-28 17:16:02 GMT+8 Results : /root/superbench.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Share result: · http://www.speedtest.net/result/8894341158.png · https://paste.ubuntu.com./p/fZ4YMRWsfz/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------

2019年9月28日 · 2 分钟 · 浅忆

简书移动端Web劫持、跳转app问题

背景 每次手机上搜资料时,只要进入了简书,那么必定会跳转到各种app(淘宝、京东、天猫、京东金融等等),很烦的啊。 2020-02-02 更新: 在csdn、豆瓣上也发现这个问题。 我还以为是我本地宽带或者dns劫持,但是我本地dns用的是114和119,很少出现这种问题,而且简书也是https,浏览器也是绿标, 所以就usb chrome 远程调试看了下,不看不知道,居然会唤醒这么多app和跳转网页。 临时解决方案 屏蔽 ad.lflucky.com 这个域名(建议屏蔽这个域名下的所有二级域名),host改也行。 方法一: 手机端使用 火狐浏览器,安装 AdGuard 广告过滤插件,屏蔽 ad.lflucky.com 方法二、有位读者推荐的软件也很不错,AdGuard Home ,安装在软路由中使用~ 2020-03-09: 广告代码改为https://jian.t58b.com/js/jan/jian.js所以,继续屏蔽 jian.t58b.com 最后想了下,既然是cdn劫持,那么我把cdn域名一刀切怎么样,别说,效果还蛮不错的,界面干净了。 屏蔽整个cdn下的js,不过这样带来的后果是文章不能动态加载出来,只适合偶尔使用简书。 1 cdn2.jianshu.io/*.js 手机端用yandex浏览器,装广告屏蔽插件,屏蔽 ad.lflucky.com 这个域名(建议屏蔽这个域名下的所有二级域名),我个人装的是广告终结者,本来想装uBlock的,懒得折腾就没装。或者路由器ad插件屏蔽这个域名。添加屏蔽域名后完美,终于不再跳转。 分析 因为我的前端是废的,所以也只能进行简单点的分析,大佬们看看就好了。 简单分析了一下跳转js,点击 VM2486:1 进入到js,格式化后的代码如下 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 (function() { function getJson(a, b) { var c = new XMLHttpRequest(); c.open("get", a); c.send(null); c.onreadystatechange = function() { if (c.readyState == 4 && c.status == 200) { b && b(eval("(" + c.responseText + ")")) } } } function ProductLink(a) { this.product = a.productJson; this.disabledArea = ["UNITED STATES", "JAPAN", "SINGAPORE", "CANADA", "香港", "北京", "上海"]; this.avokeTime = a.avokeTime } ProductLink.prototype.init = function() { var b = this; if (window.navigator.platform.indexOf("Win") > -1 || window.navigator.platform.indexOf("Mac") > -1) {} else { this.isDisabled(function() { var a = true; try { for (var i = 0; i < b.disabledArea.length; i++) { if (returnCitySN["cname"].indexOf(b.disabledArea[i]) > -1) { a = false; break } } } catch(e) {} if (!a) { return } b.addElement() }) } }; ProductLink.prototype.isDisabled = function(a) { var b = document.createElement("script"); var c = false; document.body.appendChild(b); b.src = "https://pv.sohu.com/cityjson"; b.onload = function() { if (!c) { c = true; a && a() } }; setTimeout(function() { if (!c) { c = true; a && a() } }, 4000) }; ProductLink.prototype.addElement = function() { var a = this; setTimeout(function() { a.showMainProject(); a.showSecondaryProduct() }, 2000) }; ProductLink.prototype.showMainProject = function() { this.showAllKind(this.product.mainProduct.appLink, this.product.mainProduct.cancelTime) }; ProductLink.prototype.showSecondaryProduct = function() { var b = this; var c = this.product.secondaryProduct.concat(); var d = c.length; var e = null; e = setInterval(function() { if (d <= 0) { clearInterval(e); return } var a = Math.floor(Math.random() * d); b.showAllKind(c[a].appLink, c[a].cancelTime); c.splice(a, 1); d-- }, b.avokeTime * 1000) }; ProductLink.prototype.showAllKind = function(a, b) { var c = a.concat(); var d = c.length; var e = false; var f = this.getCurrentDate(); while (d > 0 && !e) { var g = Math.floor(Math.random() * d); if (c[g].type == "random") { this.newIframe(c[g].link, b); e = true } else if (c[g].type == "date") { if (c[g][f]) { this.newIframe(c[g][f], b); e = true } else { c.splice(g, 1); d-- } } } }; ProductLink.prototype.getCurrentDate = function() { var a = new Date(), Y = a.getFullYear() + "-", M = (a.getMonth() + 1 < 10 ? "0" + (a.getMonth() + 1) : a.getMonth() + 1) + "-", D = a.getDate() < 10 ? "0" + a.getDate() : a.getDate(); return Y + M + D }; ProductLink.prototype.newIframe = function(b, c) { var d = document.createElement("iframe"); d.style.display = "none"; d.src = b; document.body.appendChild(d); var e = document.createElement("iframe"); e.style.display = "none"; e.src = "./counturl.html?url=" + encodeURIComponent(b); document.body.appendChild(e); setTimeout((function(m, a) { return function() { document.body.removeChild(m); document.body.removeChild(a) } })(d, e), c * 1000) }; getJson("./json/product.json", function(a) { new ProductLink(a).init() }) })(); 嗯,上面有个getJson方法,搜索了下加载记录发现域名是: ...

2019年8月31日 · 5 分钟 · 浅忆

hetzner ex42 款机器网速只能达到一半解决方法

问题 上个月买的ex42机器,到今天才有时间测试,结果发现网速达不到G口,只有500m的样子,在群里大佬的帮助下,确定了是网卡驱动的问题,但是这款机器的网卡不一定全部一样,我的是 1 I219-LM 系统自带模板中的网卡驱动有问题,DMA访问时间过长,NIC在繁重的UDP流量上挂起,这会影响TCP性能。 修复方法: 为了重新获得完整的传输速度,可以通过以下命令关闭TCP分段卸载: 1 ethtool -K <interface> tso off gso off 暂时关闭后可以达到标准速度,但是并不完全理想,实际上需要更新驱动程序,我就不折腾了。 官方wiki说明:https://wiki.hetzner.de/index.php/Low_performance_with_Intel_i218/i219_NIC/en 开机启动自动加载NIC配置的方法:https://forum.manjaro.org/t/solved-only-half-gigabit-eth-with-intel-i219-lm-v-under-kernel-4-14-to-4-19/58886/37

2019年8月30日 · 1 分钟 · 浅忆

上手一台Dell R720

最近上手一台dell R720 的服务器,配置如下: 1 2 3 4 5 6 cpu:E5 2650*2 内存:128G ddr3 1600 三星ssd *1 (具体型号忘记了) 2T 7200 sas硬盘 *2 双电源 H710阵列卡 iDRAC7 远程控制卡 然后我把原来的两块sas硬盘拆了装到这个机器上,组Raid5,平时没跑东西时功耗 98W(更新,功率计测试 106 W),CPU满载260W。 然后通过ipmitool限制风扇转速(因为硬盘不是原厂的,导致识别不了风扇会提高转速)为20%,这样就不吵了,同时写脚本监控,如果cpu温度大于50°就开启风扇自动控制,以免温度过高,脚本参考链接。 unixbench.sh 跑分(最后的多核没跑出来,因为我用的pve,debain用不了这个脚本,就开了lxc来跑) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/unixbench/UnixBench' sh: 3dinfo: command not found # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: CT100: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.15.18-10-pve -- #1 SMP PVE 4.15.18-32 (Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:09:37 +0100) Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 12: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 13: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 14: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 15: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 16: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 17: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 18: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 19: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 20: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 21: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 22: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 23: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 24: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 25: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 26: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 27: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 28: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 29: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 30: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 31: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (4002.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 13:12:02 up 55 min, 1 user, load average: 1.13, 2.30, 1.47; runlevel 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 20 2019 13:12:02 - 13:39:09 32 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30625056.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3710.8 MWIPS (5.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3703.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 531487.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 138496.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1673546.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 720341.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 78789.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2392.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2302.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1283.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 619739.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30625056.6 2624.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3710.8 674.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 3703.9 861.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 531487.4 1342.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 138496.2 836.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1673546.3 2885.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 720341.4 579.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 78789.3 197.0 Process Creation 126.0 2392.4 189.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.9 543.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1283.9 2139.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 619739.3 413.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 780.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 20 2019 13:39:09 - 13:39:09 32 CPUs in system; running 32 parallel copies of tests ======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

2019年8月20日 · 7 分钟 · 浅忆